Marketing budget-cutting slows; new projects pick up

For those who may be wearying of hearing about “green shoots” …well, sorry, but here are a few more;  and these are fairly close to home.  They were dug up by an Association of National Advertisers study (repeating one done 6 and 12 months ago), and nicely summarized by Jack Loechner as a Research Brief in the MediaPost blog.

For starters, 87% of marketers surveyed are still being pressured to reduce costs;  that sounds bad, but this is down from the 93% of 6 months ago and about even with the level of a year ago.  OK, so it’s not much;  but we did say green shoot, not an entire bush with flowers.

Perhaps more impressive… [Read more...]

How to keep your website’s content fresh

We hear this plaintive wail from clients all the time:  “With everything else going on, how can we ever keep posting fresh content to our website?”

Well, here’s a bit of tough love on this:  keeping your website in tip-top shape is your job …not an interruption of it.  If it’s hard for you to find time to generate fresh, relevant content for your site, then I’d respectfully suggest that your priorities are out of line with the fact that today’s website is central to every B2B’s marketing strategy, not some hobby off to the side like it may have been 10 years ago.

Second point:  it’s not your job alone, but the whole company’s.  HR should “own” the Careers and perhaps Management Bios sections …and therefore the responsibility for keeping them updated;  Finance, the Investors section;  Product Management or Marketing, the Products area …and so on.

We found some other hints that can [Read more...]

So, is it social networking? …or social notworking?

Well, it was only a matter of time before all the hype around social networking produced a backlash …and it now has.  See for example Luis Paez’s provocatively titled piece “Social Media is Useless”, over at The Direct Marketing Voice.  Actually, Luis backs away from the title a bit, marshaling some audience-reach stats to support what he really means:  that “social media is useless – unless integrated into a larger context and a larger media mix.”  And he does finally advise adding social media …but in a controlled and balanced fashion.

Nonetheless, there is no shortage of real naysayers on the subject of social media.  And if your focus is exclusively on lead generation …well, it will be difficult to show an airtight connection between your Twittering and a lead, never mind a downstream sale.

Over at the WebMarketCentral blog, Tom Pick takes issue with the “Luddites” and runs down some of the business uses of social media… [Read more...]

Social media as viewed by four top B2B marketers

Found this nifty little post over on DMNews, being a collection of the thoughts of four B2B marketers on the uses of social media.  You’ll want to click on over and give it a full read;  but herewith, a greatly condensed summary…

From:  Rob Crumpler, President & CEO, BuzzLogic
Take time to understand social media;  know your audience, determine where the most relevant conversations are happening.  “Targeting decision makers when they are engaged in content impacts message recall and click-through rates.  Campaigns that focus on topics complementary to the business often outperform those that are product or company-specific.”

From:  Steve Nielsen, President & CEO, PartnerUp
“One way to make the most of social media is to use it as… [Read more...]

Keys to getting stalled B2B leads moving again

No question, leads have been much harder to come by in the present economy.  This has led B2Bs to focus much more strongly on their existing lead pipeline, on the theory that it will be easier to close one of those than to generate a new lead.

This focus extends even to “stalled” leads… those that have started through your nurturing process, but whose forward progress appears to have stopped.  In better times, you might demote these one stage;  wait them out to see if they restart;  or just write them off as evidently not as good as they first seemed.  But these are not those times, so it behooves any B2B to figure out what’s up with those stalled leads.

Writing in The DemandGen Report, Dave Green discusses four practices that will improve results at each stage of the cycle, including helping free up those stuck leads:

Research.  Marketing and Sales should conduct research to determine precisely why sales are stalling, and what incentives or other tactics might get them moving again.  Ideally, such surveys will be transparently integrated into the overall nurturing program.

Lead definition.  While many B2Bs have universal definitions of what constitutes a qualified lead in place, those definitions should be revisited frequently.  In theory at least, in a down economy salespeople should be less swamped, and therefore able to talk to prospects at an earlier point in the cycle.

Scalable nurturing/re-engagement.  Use what was learned from the research to refine what stalled leads see next.  How much more likely is a prospect to respond, if the next email they get speaks directly to the reasons they had for putting their buying cycle on hold?

Phone followup/re-engagement.  No matter how sophisticated your automated nurturing process is, there’s simply no substitute for human interaction.  Well-trained telemarketing representatives can leverage a response event to engage more senior decision makers and make important judgment calls about mission-critical lead qualification criteria.

While no one can change the economy, most B2Bs can improve the yield on their lead generation investment by following these four simple guidelines;  but it all starts with a deep understanding of your customer and their buying behavior.

Just how valuable is your nurturing email series?

Sure, you “know” it is;  you can just feel it in your bones.  Plus there’s the odd war story of the customer who tells you they followed your email series for months, and used it as part of the justification for their purchase decision.

Trouble is…

  • keeping that series rolling takes a significant, very visible investment of time;  and
  • your boss wants hard numbers, not just that “warm feeling”.

So, how can you measure the true value of that weekly (or thereabouts) email newsletter?  Maria Pergolino, in a nifty post over on the Modern B2B Marketing blog, has provided a systematic recipe.  First, you’ll want to look at… [Read more...]

Why you really shouldn’t cut your SEM budget in a downturn

We’ve blogged before about how smart companies maintain or even increase their marketing spend during recessions;  it’s the easiest and cheapest time to grow market share.

But let’s say you’ve made that case and lost, so budget cuts are looming;  where should you make them, and what should you strive to hang on to, or maybe even increase?

There’s a strong case to be made for cutting your “push” marketing (such things as print and TV/radio advertising, direct mail, etc.), since otherwise you will be paying the same for a recession-reduced number of leads;  and maintaining or increasing your “pull” marketing (most notably search engine marketing), where your cost per lead may actually go down.  How is this possible?  Well, for one thing, instead of saturation-bombing your target market, hoping to hit a number of prospects at the right time, you are able to make contact with a potential customer at the exact time (s)he is seeking your products and services.  Furthermore:

With PPC, your costs are likely to decrease anyway, since fewer buyers are looking;  but this will be a real, market-driven decrease, not an arbitrary dictate made by some green eyeshade far removed from the fray.  And as always, you’re only paying for those interested enough to click through.

On SEO:  if you maintain your effort, you can reasonably expect your SERP position to rise simply because many of your competitors will probably be cutting their SEO expense as a presumed “frill”.  (Imagine what you might be able to do by increasing your effort  just a wee bit…!)

Evidently more than a few companies are signed on to this prescription, since study after study shows an accelerating shift of marketing spending from traditional to online.  (For more on this rationale, see Scott Buresh’s excellent post in Search Engine Guide.)